The 2025 NCAA Tournament selection process has ignited passionate debate across the college basketball landscape. Several deserving teams with impressive résumés were left on the outside looking in while North Carolina somehow secured an at-large bid despite an abysmal 1-12 record in Quad 1 games, the metric designed to measure performance against top competition.
West Virginia, Indiana, Ohio State, and Boise State all built compelling cases for inclusion, yet they’ll be watching March Madness from home. The controversial selections have led many fans and analysts to question whether historical reputation and committee connections carried more weight than actual on-court performance, threatening the integrity of college basketball’s showcase event.
West Virginia, Indiana, and More: The Biggest Snubs
West Virginia’s exclusion stands as perhaps the most egregious oversight. The Mountaineers finished 19-13 with an impressive six Quad 1 victories, including signature wins over powerhouses Gonzaga and Arizona.
Even after losing star player Tucker DeVries to injury, they managed four Quad 1 wins without him demonstrating remarkable resilience and team depth.
West Virginia at 19-13 with wins over Zaga, Zona, Kansas at Kansas, Iowa State gets left out of March Madness.
10-10 in the Big 12. Went from what I thought was a for sure bid as “Last Four Byes” to not even in the dance.
Ridiculous man. Shameful
— Matthew McAdow (@MattsTake1) March 16, 2025
Indiana similarly has reason to feel aggrieved. Despite a challenging midseason stretch, the Hoosiers finished strong at 19-13. With Coach Mike Woodson’s final season at the helm, the team’s exclusion feels particularly harsh. Ohio State and Boise State also built compelling cases for inclusion but were left watching from home as seemingly less deserving teams received bids.
Ohio State compiled six Quad 1 wins and performed admirably in non-conference play. While a late-season slump hurt their tournament chances, their body of work remains more impressive than several teams that received large bids, raising questions about how heavily recency bias factored into the committee’s decisions.
Boise State reached the Mountain West championship game and finished with an impressive 24-10 record. Yet the committee seemingly favored other mid-major programs with less compelling résumés, which continued a troubling pattern of inconsistency when evaluating teams outside power conferences.
While many teams felt snubbed, North Carolina’s inclusion has drawn the most scrutiny, as their weak Quad 1 record contrasts sharply with teams like West Virginia and Indiana, who had stronger résumés but were left out.
The selection committee defended their choice by pointing to Memphis’ winning the AAC Tournament, which they claim freed up an at-large spot that benefited North Carolina. They also emphasized the importance of late-season performance.
However, critics maintain that West Virginia and Indiana demonstrated stronger overall bodies of work and more impressive victories against quality competition, making their exclusion difficult to justify.
KEEP READING: March Madness Sleepers — Ranking The Double-Digit Seeds
March Madness thrives on unpredictability once the games begin but the selection process itself should be characterized by fairness and consistency. This controversy highlights the ongoing flaws in the NCAA selection system with deserving teams like West Virginia and more watching from the sidelines.
As the debate continues, calls for greater transparency and potential reform of the selection process grow louder.
Don’t miss a moment of March Madness! Download your 2025 NCAA Tournament printable bracket and stay on top of every game, matchup, and Cinderella story. Get yours now!
