As the 2025 NFL Draft approaches, the Cleveland Browns face a decision regarding their No. 2 overall pick. The primary dilemma is whether to select Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders, who could secure a franchise quarterback, or trade down to gain more draft capital for broader team improvements.
Browns’ Draft Dilemma: Shedeur Sanders or Strategic Trade?
With Cam Ward likely off the board, Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders looms as a major prospect for the Browns. Throughout his collegiate career, Sanders has displayed excellent poise, accuracy, and leadership—qualities highly valued in an NFL quarterback.
His standout career at Colorado has positioned him as a potential franchise quarterback, which fits the Browns’ need for a transformative leader under center. According to reports, the Browns are very interested in Sanders, with top-30 visits scheduled to assess his fit within the team.
Conversely, trading down from No. 2 opens the possibility of addressing various roster needs by gaining additional draft picks. This strategy could be especially advantageous given the Browns’ current roster structure and desire to add depth at multiple positions.
Bill Barnwell of ESPN explored situations in which teams in similar circumstances traded down to acquire more picks, thereby improving overall team strength.
Barnwell’s analysis of Round 1 trades shows that teams often benefit from trading down, particularly when the draft class is deep at multiple positions. For the Browns, this could mean bolstering both their offense and defense, laying the foundation for long-term success.
Several quarterback-needy teams could be interested in trading up to No. 2. The New York Giants, for example, have expressed interest in top quarterback prospects like Cam Ward and Shedeur Sanders.
With Deshaun Watson’s contract constraining salary cap flexibility, acquiring a quarterback like Sanders could signal a new beginning. However, trading down might help the Browns fill many spots, enhancing team depth.
The Browns’ roster boasts considerable strengths, notably on the defensive line, which includes players like Myles Garrett. However, certain areas require attention, such as the offensive line, secondary, and receiving corps.
Trading down could provide the resources needed to address these gaps, resulting in a more balanced and competitive roster.
The Browns’ No. 2 draft decision reflects the classic debate between acquiring a potential franchise quarterback and using the draft position to enhance the entire team. As draft day nears, the Browns’ choice will significantly impact the team’s direction in the coming seasons.
