The landscape of college football continues to evolve rapidly as name, image and likeness (NIL) deals reshape relationships between players, programs and fans. Syracuse Orange wide receiver Trebor Pena’s recent decision to enter the transfer portal – reportedly in pursuit of a more lucrative NIL deal – has once again brought NIL controversies to the forefront of college football discussions.
This move comes shortly after Tennessee quarterback Nico Iamaleava’s unprecedented NIL holdout sent shockwaves through the sport.
How Trebor Pena’s NIL Play Sparked Fresh Controversy Amid Nico Iamaleava’s Chaos
Pena established himself as a cornerstone of Syracuse’s offense in 2024, posting career highs with 84 receptions, 941 receiving yards and nine touchdowns. He also ranked among the nation’s best in kick return average. Despite his on-field success and the opportunity to build a legacy at Syracuse, Pena shocked fans by entering the transfer portal—reportedly in search of a more substantial NIL package.
As Syracuse Football’s official account noted, “Pena could have cemented a legacy. Instead, he’ll likely get a bigger paycheck.”
Meanwhile, former five-star recruit Nico Iamaleava staged what many are calling college football’s first NIL holdout at Tennessee. After trying to renegotiate his deal from approximately $2 million to $4 million annually and being denied, Iamaleava skipped practices and team meetings before ultimately departing the program.
Former NFL guard and Syracuse alum Justin Pugh defended players like Pena, saying “So many of those guys don’t make the NFL and this is the only opportunity he’ll have at maximizing his skill set.”
The Broken System and Calls for Change
The cases of Pena and Iamaleava underscore fundamental issues with college football’s NIL framework. Programs now face the challenge of balancing competitive success with the financial realities of NIL, which can lead to roster instability and talent drain. For smaller programs like Syracuse, retaining top talent amid NIL competition from bigger schools has become increasingly difficult.
“The system is broken and needs an overhaul. It was broken before in the opposite direction, where the players got nothing. Be mad at the system, not the player,” commented one observer.
College football analyst Joel Klatt also criticized the current landscape, writing: “NIL and the XFR portal did not ruin college football… The pathetic and inept NCAA not enforcing rules is threatening to ruin college football… So, we need a governing body to step in and enforce mutually agreed-upon rules… It is really that simple.”
For players like Pena, NIL deals offer crucial financial opportunities—especially for those who may never play in the NFL. But for fans and programs, the new reality of players prioritizing compensation over loyalty or legacy marks a significant cultural shift.
KEEP READING: Biggest Surprises to Enter the Transfer Portal This Spring
As the sport continues to navigate this new era, stakeholders across college football must work toward creating a more sustainable NIL system—one that fairly compensates players while preserving the integrity and tradition that make college football special.
College Sports Network has you covered with the latest news, analysis, insights, and trending stories in football, men’s basketball, women’s basketball, and baseball!
